Friday, 27 January 2012

BOKO HARAM No section of the country has monopoly of violence —Uwazurike, MASSOB leader

From VAL OKARA, Owerri
Saturday January 28, 2012
Uwazuruike
Photo: Sun News Publishing

More Stories on This Section
Against the backdrop of the sustained killing of people, especially Ndigbo, in the northern part of the country, the leader of the Movement for the Actualisation of the Sovereign State of Biafra (MASSOB), Chief Ralph Uwazurike, spoke to Saturday Sun. He also discussed the death and the burial arrangements of Dim Odumegwu Ojukwu.
Killing of Igbo in the North
Our  position  has been made  known to the public. As matter of fact, we have taken up advertorial to make our points known. Right now, we are saddled with the responsibility of burying our leader, Dim Chukwuemeka Odumegwu Ojukwu and you know the involvement  of MASSOB in the  burial is massive. We think  that at this particular time, we will not combine  anything  with the burial  of our leader. So, it is very  unfortunate  that the massacre of Ndigbo is occurring at the time Eze Ndigbo is yet to be  buried. Our  late leader  was on the forefront of delivering our people from  bondage.

The  things   he saw then are  the things  that are happening today. All  the things he foresaw  about 40 years  ago, are happening which  many Nigerians did not see and that  also reinforced  my own activities  that what  I foresaw about 15  years  are things many Nigerians  are seeing today. I saw  then, when  it was about  30 years after the war,  that the war had not really ended.  The peace existing in Nigeria  was the peace of the graveyard.  There was  no sincerity in that peace and all the things  cumulated in  the forming of MASSOB are the things  that are prevailing today. The people didn’t  see that the time I started  MASSOB it is not a new thing to us because we  anticipated it and that  is why we form MBASSOB.  It will be  new to other Nigerians  and to those  who will not be able   to see tomorrow. It is new to  them that bombs  are being   thrown  around,  but  to us, it is no news because  that was what  we saw that made us to clamour for Biafra and  that was what Ojukwu saw that made him to declare  the Republic  of  Biafra.  We   positive  thinkers, it was not new to us.

 The killing of Igbos started  in 1945 in the same  Kano, 25 years  before  the independence of Nigeria. So, you can see it did not  start today  and we are  asking  for the  permanent solution and the permanent solution is for Nigeria to bifurcate (divide) and people  don’t seem to marry this word.  Nigerians   try to play cosmetic world. The only solution to the crisis in Nigeria  today is to bifurcate  Nigeria.  It has happened  in so many places. If Nigeria is not bifurcated for the different ethnic nationalities to go to their different  ways,  there will be no peace in Nigeria.

To  talk about Boko Haram,  I have nothing against  Boko Haram  and the moment   they started, I came out and I said that I supported   them.  They are saying  the same thing I am saying,  but the only  difference  is on methodology –   killing  innocent  people.  I don’t support killing  innocent people.  I don’t   do anything  that will bring  the  spillage of blood  otherwise,  we are saying the same thing. They  said that they want  Islamic state and I said we want Biafra. It is  all about  self-determination. They are Muslims and we are Christians; our cultures  are different and  they believe  that if they kill, they will go to heaven  and I don’t believe  that if I kill  I will go to  heaven. So, we have different  ideology  and concept.   Remember in India it happened – the Muslims, the Hindus and the British saw that they couldn’t co-habit. But in the  case of Nigeria  they (British ) kept  blind eyes  because of the oil. 

At  the beginning, they knew that there was no way the North and the South could co-habit, but because of the natural resources they saw in the southern Nigeria, that is oil and because of their interest and they believed that the North could assist them exploit  the  oil if they are in leadership.  Upon all the killings in Nigeria, they keep blind eyes. They don’t talk about it and they only condemn it, condemning what?  The people are killed in their hundreds, the United Nations  came up with  one sympathy condolence  message. If it was other nation, the UN will take a different position. Look at the case of Biafra, the genocide,  the UN  pretended  as if it didn’t  see anything. But if it had happened  in another part of the world, they would pick  interest.
In conclusion, what is happening  today will continue to happen unless  in this country, justice is  done and for justice  to be done in Nigeria  the different ethnic  nationalities should be separated  peaceful.

Are you calling for Sovereign National Conference (SNC)?
I don’t advocate sovereign National Conference because the  moment  you convoke it (SNC), politicians will hijack it and once they  hijack it, they will make nonsense  of it. Take, for instance, if you call for National  Conference  and you said  that Ndigbo should be  represented,  the politicians  should go there  to represent  Ndigbo, then the powers  that be will grease their palms, they will call  the leader  and promised  a plum  position and he will change  immediately and tell the whole  world that  Igbos are in  support of one Nigeria. But you  would know that  it was  because  of his selfish  interest, not for the  interest  of the majority of Ndigbo. So, when   you talk about SNC, you only tell it  to people  who  don’t understand it.  Who are the people  that will go there to represent others? It will be the same politicians we saw yesterday, they go there for their own interest. They know  that what they are saying  cannot be for the benefit of the people, but they are  saying it for their  own benefits.  Everybody knows in Nigeria today that the only solution is for the division  of Nigeria, but people  will say no, we  want one Nigeria.  They will say that they want a bigger country where they will be President, Senate President among others or closeness to the nation’s  treasury  not because of the interest of the people.
The solution to Nigeria crises is not the  convocation  of the  Sovereign National Conference. The solution is self-determination and not to discuss  whether  Nigeria  can be  one or whether  there  will be true federalism. If the  agenda  of the SNC will be  centred on self-determination, I will support it.

As a non-violent group, how would  MASSOB respond to  Boko Haram  if the killing of Ndigbo continues unabated?
No, no, the issue is, when you get to the bridge, you will cross it. We  preach non-violence, but if you are in your house and another  man comes in and takes  away your wife, you cannot  say because  you believe in peace, he should go away with your wife. We preach non-violence  to the extent that we do not  intend to attack anybody but if you attack us, at least we  have the right  to self-defence and programmes can change with time, depending on the prevailing circumstances.  If our people are killed,  we have  the right  to defend them; we have that right to provide  them with security and remember, even self-defence we have the right  also to kill in order to defend  ourselves.  If the person is coming to attack you  and you see the force he is coming  up with is strong  enough  to kill you,  you kill   him in  self-defence. In the process of defending our people, we can also kill; it all amounts to self-defence. MASSOB’s position on non-violence does not mean folding our hands  to watch  our people  being   slaughtered. No! It doesn’t amount to that.
 
Do  you think  that the Federal Government has done enough to protect  vulnerable Nigerians  in the North?

The Federal Government has not  done enough in providing  security  to Nigerians in the North.  I think  the situation  is above them now.  My advice to President Goodluck Jonathan now is to call a meeting  of all ethnic  nationalities and place only one  agenda before them, which is self-determination for the different ethnic  nationalities to go their different  ways. I have said it before and I will continue to say it and that is the only solution.  History will not forgive him if he doesn’t use his good offices today to bring self-determination as the final  solution to the crises because  if he doesn’t  do it, history  will never forgive  him and another person will do it. And until there is self-determination in Nigeria among the ethnic nationalities, there will be no  peace in Nigeria.
 
Call for Ndigbo in the north to return home, is it a solution?

Ndigbo in the North should bring back home their children and wives and they will remain there to protect their investments. There is a struggle in Nigeria and that struggle is self-determination. The  struggle for independence which Ndigbo is fighting for. There is struggle for independence  now  because we cannot suffer  what we had suffered before and the moment  the Igbos left, they will tag their houses  and investments as abandoned properties because  that is what they are looking for.  My advice  is that they should  bring back their children  and  wives  home and stay  there. Then we are watching. We know that nobody has the monopoly of  violence, but we  are keeping  quiet  for so many reasons, reasons   that border on the fact that  our leader just died and he must  be given  a benefiting burial before  we open our eyes  to what is really  happening. We are taking our time. What is  Boko Haram?  If we come out  today, Boko Haram will fizzle  out and all of them would run  away.  The danger in  it  is that all  these Hausa and Yourbas  condemning  the activities  of Boko Haram will  join hands to fight  Ndigbo. That is why we taking our time  and you must appreciate our  position. If we come out shouting nzogbu enyimba enyi, and head towards the North, all of them will run across the  Sahara desert. We can chase them away.

Any palliative measures  in place to accommodate the returnees ?
Well, I am a member of the Igbo Elders, we hold meetings in the residence of our late leader, Dim Odumegwu Ojukwu. The main reason we are holding  that meeting  is that  of the crisis  in the North and how those Ndigbo returning from the North will be taken care of. We advised that Ohanaeze should open registers in different states for them to register their names. I think at the end of our meeting today, Saturday January 28, we will issue a communiqué to that effect.
 
Apart from self-determination you canvassed for, is there any other solution to the insurgence of Boko Haram?

My brother, there is no other solution. Take for instance, the emergence of Boko Haram. Before the 2011 Presidential election, some elements in the North said that if the power doesn’t come to them, there would be crisis and as a matter of fact one of them said that those who make peaceful change impossible would also make violent change inevitable. And after that election you see what is happening now. It is targeted at President Goodluck Jonathan. What people don’t understand is that if for any reason they disgrace Jonathan out of power, that oil they are lifting from the Niger Delta may not work again because the Niger Delta people will not allow the oil to be lifted by parasites. The only solution today is to divide Nigeria because there is no more trust. The best thing now to do is division of Nigeria and good a thing, they said they need Islamic  state. Please, for God’s  sake, give it  to them. To stop   these killings, the North   and South   have to  part ways.  Any  tribe   that wants  to stay, should be allowed  to do so.
You have been given the title of Eze Igbo Gburugburu II, thereby stepping  into the big shoes of the late Dim Odumegwu Ojukwu, do you   think you can fit into the shoes?
As a matter of fact, I was called  from the palace of Eze Nri to inform me that I had  a letter and I told them  I would send somebody to pick  it for me. They waited  for one week and they called me again. I sent  Ogurrish  (Chief   Rommy) to go and  pick the letter for me and he went  and stayed  for three days.  He called three days after that my letter was with   him  and I instructed him to read it and  let me  know the  content.  When he read the content to me,  I cried. Early  the following day, I went to him to pick the letter by myself because I could  not believe  it.  I feel so humbled and asking God  to handle  this position for me.  I don’t even know why these people  should  consider  me – seeing my little self  fitting  into Ojukwu’s  shoes. In fact, Ojukwu’s  shoes  are very intimidating.
 One thing  about our people is, no  matter  what  they do, they  don’t  forget  those who are fighting  for them and that is what Ojukwu had always  told me. Ojukwu told me that no matter what you can say about our  people, Ndigbo,  they don’t forget  those who had suffered for them. I have never  thought of  it before or thought that Eze Nri  and his  cabinet  could consider  me for the position. It was very  strange  to me and it made me cry bitterly  because  it was unexpected  and up till  now, I feel  it is a very  big  challenge and  I  pray God  to assist me.
 
With your  position, how  would galvanize Ndigbo for a purposeful leadership?

Do you know  one thing, most  of Igbo elders  I always  cherished and whenever I call them on phone or go to greet them, they always referred to me, as ‘my leader’ or ‘our leader’  and sometimes I don’t  know  how to continue with the discussion  again.  I have only started in my little  way and many senior citizens  of Igboland have called  me on phone  to encourage  me.  I feel so humbled. We  are using  Ojukwu’s  house   as our  meeting point and we  will continue  to use it.  To us (Igboman) Ojukwu is not dead.  His House at Enugu is just like  a Mecca  to us and for me to succeed, I have to  continue my attachment to that  family.  And for Ndigbo to see progress, they have to attach themselves  to Ojukwu’s  house. I am canvassing  that  Ndigbo should  always  go to his graveside and  asked  God  to give us the strength to survive.  There is no way  you  can achieve   greatness  without  Ojukwu.  Ojukwu’s death must bring  the unity  of Ndigbo  because  he had  been the foremost Igboman that ever lived.  I know  that in the spirit  world  now he is fighting  for us and now that he is there our  problem will be lesser because   he is fighting  for us.  For us to achieve anything, we must  attach ourselves to him. In the past,  there was no spirit covering Ndigbo in our struggle,  but today,  Ojukwu is in that place coordinating  things for us.

Boko Haram threatens Jonathan

Become a Muslim or ...
By The Sun Publishing
Saturday January 28, 2012
Photo: Sun News Publishing

The leader of a radical Islamist sect launching increasingly bloody attacks in Nigeria has rejected offers for a negotiated peace, instead promising to kidnap government officials’ family members and bomb schools, according to an Internet audio message allegedly posted by the group , Associated Press reported yesterday.

The message by Imam Abubakar Shekau of the sect known as Boko Haram comes amid continuing unrest in north Nigeria following the group’s attack in Kano that killed at least 185 people. A daylight attack on Muslim traders in the north killed 15 people, while gunmen also have kidnapped a German there.

Shekau’s 40-minute message also for the first time discusses Boko Haram’s goal: Complete adoption of Islam across Nigeria, a multiethnic nation of more than 160 million people split largely between a Christian south and a Muslim north. And Shekau said he remains prepared to order more violence to accomplish that.
“If (Nigerian security forces) are going to places of worship and destroying them, like mosques and Quranic schools, you have primary schools as well, you have secondary schools and universities and we will start bombing them,” Shekau said. “Touch us and see. That is what we will do.”

The video posted to YouTube on Wednesday shows a still image of Shekau sitting on a beige sofa, a Kalashnikov rifle at his back. Speaking at times in Arabic, English and the Hausa language of Nigeria’s north, Shekau said negotiations suggested by President Goodluck Jonathan between the sect and the government will not happen.
“He’s lying. He cannot do it,” Shekau said. “If Jonathan does not repent as a Muslim, even if I die myself, Jonathan’s going to see. He’s looking at me like I’m nobody, but he’ll see.”

In the message, Shekau acknowledged that Boko Haram carried out the Jan. 20 attacks in Kano, Nigeria’s second largest city, that killed at least 185 people. Gunmen from the sect armed with explosives and assault rifles, some wearing army and police uniforms, others suicide car bombers, attacked police stations, immigration offices and the local headquarters of Nigeria’ secret police.
However, Shekau denied killing civilians in the attack, claiming the sect’s gunmen tried to protect the more than 9 million people who live in the important city in Nigeria’s north. Government officials have said many of those killed by the sect were Muslim civilians.
“We’re killing police officers, we’re killing soldiers and other government people who are fighting Allah and Christians who are killing Muslims and talking badly about our Islamic religion,” Shekau said. “I am not against anyone, but if Allah asks me to kill someone, I will kill him and I will enjoy killing him like I am killing a chicken.”

Shekau also said the sect’s attack on Kano came after the arrests, and in some cases torture, of sect members’ wives and children. Nigeria’s federal police often arrest family members to force those they want into turning themselves over to authorities.
The Associated Press could not immediately verify the authenticity of the recording, though it sounded like others attributed to Shekau in the past.
Boko Haram wants to implement strict Shariah law and avenge the deaths of Muslims killed in religious and ethnic violence across Nigeria. The group, whose name means “Western education is sacrilege” in the Hausa language of Nigeria’s north, has now killed at least 262 people in 2012, more than half of the at least 510 people the sect killed in all of 2011, according to an Associated Press count.
The sect also began specifically targeting Christians living in the north at the start of the year, exploiting already existing tensions between the two religions in a nation where religious and ethnic rioting has killed thousands in recent years.
The attack by Boko Haram comes during continued unrest across Nigeria’s north. In Kano, gunmen kidnapped a German citizen Thursday working for Dantata & Sawoe Construction Company Ltd.
German Foreign Ministry spokesman Andreas Peschke told journalists Friday that the embassy and a ministry crisis unit were working hard to resolve the case.
“I can’t yet report any substantial progress,” Peschke said.
Meanwhile, Zamfara state spokesman Ibrahim Muhammad Birnin Magaji said Friday that gunmen killed 15 Muslim traders on their way to market. Birnin Magaji said the gunmen burned the bodies of their victims in a rural village in Katsina state on Thursday, about 120 miles (200 kilometers) from Kano.
He said authorities suspect an armed robbery attack, but no goods were reported missing.

Supreme Court sacks 5 govs

•Adamawa, Bayelsa, Cross River, Kogi, Sokoto speakers take over as acting govs
From GODWIN TSA, Abuja
Saturday January 28, 2012
Photo: Sun News Publishing

More Stories on This Section
The Supreme Court yesterday brought the tenure of five sitting governors to an abrupt end, with the ruling that it’s unconstitutional and illegal for their stay in office to exceed the constitutional period of four years, irrespective of fresh elections. Consequently, speakers of the affected states’ Houses of Assembly have taken over the administration of the states pending the conduct of fresh governorship elections.

The affected governors are Ibrahim Idris (Kogi), Murtala Nyako (Adamawa), Timipre Sylva (Bayelsa), Aliyu Wamakko (Sokoto) and Liyel Imoke (Cross River), whose tenure were earlier extended by a Federal High Court and the Court of Appeal beyond May 29, 2011.

The apex court, in a unanimous decision, held that election of the governors was annulled by the tribunal and not their oath of office and therefore, they have a tenure of four years from the time they took the first oath of office.
Justice Walter Onoghen, who read the lead judgment of the court, said the 1999 Constitution does not recognise a governor staying in office beyond four years.

He further held that the framers of the constitution did not envisage a re-run election, stating that no person elected under the 1999 Constitution can remain in office beyond the time provided by it.
The court also held that the 1999 Constitution did not envisage nullification, adding that even if the first election was annulled it cannot affect the oath of office and allegiance taken.

He further held that the acts of the governors, under the first election, could not be valid while the oath they took would be invalid.
According to Justice Onoghen, “generally speaking, a void act is void and nothing can be put on it. However, when you consider the nature and consequences of an election, which produced a winner, who was sworn in on the presumption that the election that produced him was regular and legally valid, then when that election is set aside or nullified, the nullification is only limited to the election and does not affect acts done while the person occupied that office.

In effect, what it all means is that the election that was later nullified was only voidable, not void, because if it is to be taken literally as void ab initio as being contended by some of the parties, it means the country would be plunged into chaos as all acts done by the governors must, of necessity, be null and void and of no effect whatsoever.
“So, when we have a situation, where the acts of the governor, whose election is nullified, are saved, then only legal explanation or meaning to be attached to the use of the words ‘null and void’ in describing the said election by the court, is ‘voidable’ ab initio.
“It is therefore, my considered view that what the lower court meant by saying that the elections were null and void is simply that they were voidable as a result of which they proceeded to annul same.

“I hold the considered view that since the acts performed during the period to the nullification of the election remains valid and subsisting and the same person contested and won the re-run election, thereby taking another set of oaths and since what was nullified was the election, the oaths they took on May 29, 2007 remains valid and the starting point in calculating their four years tenure of office as governors of their respective states, particularly as the 1999 constitution does not envisage a tenure exceeding four years by the same person who took the first oaths following the election which kick started the tenure.
“To accede to the argument of the respondents is to bring uncertainty into the clear provisions of section 180 (2) of the 1999 constitution, which will render the tenure of governors indefinite as what it will take an elected governor whose election is nullified to remain in office almost indefinitely or for life is to continue to win the re-run elections, which would then be nullified to continue the cycle of impunity.

“I hold the considered view that to uphold the validity of the acts of the governors in office, prior to the nullification of their election and reject the period they spent in office, during which time they performed those acts in the determination of the period of their tenure, is contrary to common sense and the clear intention of the framers of the constitution.

“The fact that there was an election in 2007 as a result of which the 1st respondents (governors) took their oaths of allegiance and of office are facts, which cannot be wished away, just as the acts they performed while occupying the seat. The said governors may not have been de jure governors following the nullification of their elections, which is not supported by the acceptance of their acts in that office as legal and binding on all and sundry, they were certainly governors de facto during the period they operated ostensibly in accordance with the provisions of the constitution and Electoral Act and as such the period they operated has to be taken into consideration in determining the terminal date of their tenure following, what I may call, their second missionary journey, vide a re-run election, particularly, as the constitution unequivocally grants a tenure of four years to a person elected governor of a state calculated from the date he took the oaths of allegiance and of office, which was May 29, 2007.

“It is settled in law that the time fixed by the constitution for doing anything cannot be extended. It is immutable, fixed like the rock of Gibraltar. It cannot be extended, elongated, expanded, or stretched beyond what it states. To calculate the tenure of office of the governors from the date of their second oaths of allegiance and of office while ignoring the period from May 29, 2007, when they took the first oaths, is to extend the four years tenure constitutionally granted the governors to occupy and act in that office, which would be unconstitutional. It is therefore, clear and I hereby hold that the second oaths of allegiance and of office taken in 2008, though necessary to enable them continue to function in that office, were clearly superfluous in the determination of the four years tenure under section 180 (2) of the 1999 constitution.”

With the decision of the apex court, Speaker, Bayelsa State House of Assembly, Hon Nestor Binabo, has been sworn in as acting governor. Also, Hon James Barka, Speaker, Adamawa State House of Assembly, has taken oath of office as acting governor. In Cross River State, Hon Larry Odey, Speaker of the state House of Assembly is acting governor. Alhaji Lawal Zayyanu, Sokoto State House of Assembly Speaker is acting governor of the state.
In Kogi State, the governor-elect and member of the PDP, Capt Idris Wada, who emerged victorious in governorship election held last November, has been sworn in.

Meanwhile, mixed reactions have started trailing the judgment of the apex court among lawyers and politicians.
Reacting to the judgment, constitutional lawyer and writer, Sabastine Hon, said: “Personally, I believe the Supreme Court may have to revisit that decision someday. It was the same Supreme Court that held in 2009, in the case of Labour Party Vs INEC, that when an election is annulled and a re-run ordered, both the election and the oath are gone. In this case, the original oath the governors had taken ceased to exist when they went in for elections and subsequently took fresh oath of office. There cannot be two oaths in one tenure. But since the Supreme Court is the conscience of the nation, which has jurisprudential powers to give even policy decisions, we are bound by this very decision. Any contrary opinion we hold is merely academic in nature.”

On his part, Jibrin Isah, in a statement by his consultant on public communication and strategy, Phrank Shaibu, described the Supreme Court ruling as a “cast-iron victory for truth and a clear-cut expression of the electoral wishes of the Kogi people and Nigerians.
“I congratulate all the justices on their courage and honesty, which are the pillars and hallmarks of the rule of law. I am proud of the courageous judgment. Truth and electoral wishes of the people have finally triumphed. As for the judiciary, it remains the last bastion of hope for the common man and custodian of the Rule of Law. We give kudos to our modern day Daniels. We are set for fresh elections, as may be ordered within 90 days. This has indeed, strengthened our position as the authentic and validly nominated candidate of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP).

The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) had approached the apex court to challenge the decision of the Court of Appeal, which upheld the decision of a Federal High Court sitting in Abuja that had earlier elongated the tenure of five governors.
A full panel of the Supreme Court had, on November 21, heard the argument of all counsel in the suit alongside three amicus curia invited to address it on the issue. The apex court had invited the trio of Chief Richard Akinjide, Professor Itse Sagay and Chief G.O.K Ajayi, all Senior Advocates of Nigeria (SAN) to address it on the matter.
While Akinjide advised the apex court to uphold the decision of the lower court, the duo of Sagay and Ajayi urged it to reverse the decision.

Ex-IGP, Okiro, others speak on Ringim’s sack

Contrary to insinuation and heavy criticism that President Jonathan has no grip on the incessant violence carried out by the Boko Haram sect, the sacking of Mr Hafiz Abubakar Ringim as the Inspector General of Police alongside other DIGs has sent some jitters up the spines of people just as the new helmsman on the job, IG Muhammed Dikko Abubakar has vowed  to fight all kinds of crime to a stand still.
This  shake-up in the Nigerian police has elicited different comments from Nigerians.  Some believe that the development was long over due as a result of the continual killings and attacks by the Boko Haram sect in some parts of the country.  Others however believe that the sacking of Mr Ringim and the emergence of Muhammed Abubakar will not stop the insurgence and other criminal activities if there is no political will and sincerity to deal with the situation.

Speaking with Saturday Vanguard, former Inspector General, Mike Okiro said, what the President has done is right. “Mr President has the prerogative to appoint or remove any IG.”  He stated that if the said IG has no capacity to do the job, or he is found incapable of discharging his duties to Nigerians, then he should be fired. Although he declined to comment further, but stated: “What he has done is right.”
In the same vein, the former governor of Kogi state, Alhaji Abubakar Audu wondered why Ringim was tolerated for so long before finally getting the boot few days ago. “As far as I am concerned, I won’t say, it is timely, because I don’t know why they tolerated him for so long.
A lot of things have gone wrong especially on Boko Haram and other mysterious killings.” He explained that Ringim has never gotten anything right since his appointment as the police boss. “I don’t think, there is anything that he has gotten right since he became the IG. So, I think the President was patient and very tolerant. Otherwise, what is happening now would have happened long time ago and the situation would have been arrested. He queried that the force under the leadership of Ringim could not unravel or stop the series of bomb blasts including the bombing of his own office – Police Headquarters, Abuja. In Nigeria, people occupying various positions do not resign voluntarily especially if there are records of failure on the offices they hold.
Lagos based lawyer and human rights cum political activist, Mr  Bamidele Aturu opined that it is not just the question of Mr. Ringim alone, adding that the former IG deserves what he got.  “I do not want us to make him a scapegoat.
The problem is about a big failure of security and of intelligence in Nigeria and which has been the case for quite sometime now.”  He continued:  “The incompetence and lack of professionalism that we have witnessed not just on the issue of  Boko Haram  but also criminal issues all over the country in the last few months is unbelievable.”
He argued that it is not all about Ringim, adding that other security agencies including the NSA should have been sacked  to pave the way for a new creativity on the part of the intelligence and security agencies in the country.
“It is not only Ringim that should be removed, the truth is that all of them have failed, so we just have to clean all the system; and begin afresh to fight crime and until we do that, I tell you worse things are on the way,” he said.
Lending his voice to the issue, Yahaya Ndu, a politician took a swipe on the federal government saying government had said the issue of Boko Haram was political and it ought to have employed a political solution to solving the problem.  While calling for a for a Sovereign National Conference to determine the new formula for living together amicably, he said: “I have heard people saying they are so happy that Ringim is removed, to me, it makes no sense because what we need to address in this country is institution and not individuals.”
“This government is confused because the issue of removal of IG and appointing a new one has nothing to do with this issue. Government is only looking for a scapegoat to cover for its failure to address the real issues.”
One of the most brilliant lawyers in Nigeria today, Prof  Yemi Osibajo corroborated the views of Aturu saying that  there was a need for real change on security and according to him, the first step was to appoint a new IG.  “I think, it is timely, nevertheless, I would have expected it much earlier.”
He continued: “I think, he ought to have resigned voluntarily because there was a major security lapse, especially after the escape of the suspect,  I think the IG ought to have handed over his resignation.”
Former governor of Ondo state Dr. Olusegun Agagu stated that if the President who has the prerogative to hire and fire feels it is time he has to go, so be it. He maintained that the determination of the success or  failure of Ringim’s leadership only rests upon his employer, the President but prayed for God’s guidance, courage to enable the new Police boss succeed on the job.
Right now, the heat is on the new IG, Muhammad Abubakar whose appointment has been lauded in some quarters while also receiving some knocks from faceless Nigerians particularly on the facebook.
But former governor Audu said his expectation for the new IG was to get to the root of the matter of Boko Haram, adding that the indecency that has paraded the efforts in tracking members of the group down must be removed. “We are watching him and if he fails to deliver, the President should know what to do before it is too late,” he said.
Prof Osibajo in his own view advised the federal government to restructure the police force  saying: “We ought to have realised that policing is a local thing and that is to say that if you are gong to police Kano, there should be a state police in Kano and the same goes for other states under the control of the chief security officer in that state. You cannot have an effective police force in a federation that is large as this which is controlled from Abuja.
For instance, the Boko Haram saga needs policemen who understand the terrain and speak the native language. You cannot put a policeman from Ebonyi or Oyo States in Kano at this time expecting him to be effective on the Boko Haram issue. He doesn’t know the place, he doesn’t speak the language.  You can’t have a police force of foreigners in a local environment, it will not work.”
He stated that it will be difficult for the new IG to do much because of the wrong structure of the police force. He surmised that the effect of terrorism requires local intelligent, “everywhere that terrorists operate in, the first battle you must win is the battle of intelligence in order to tidy up the intelligence effectively.  Intelligence should be the people who are trusted in the environment, you can’t be trusted when you are foreigner coming to be as spy.  So, intelligence is the crucial power for dealing with terrorism.”
Yahaya Ndu, in his own opinion said:“We must come to the round table to move forward. The same way the people who have been milking the nation dry in the name of subsidy and the president doesn’t want to deal with those people; the same way the president said, he knows those who are sponsoring the Boko Haram and instead of identifying them so that the police can arrest them and deal with them, it is shielding them and removing and appointing IGs, to me it doesn’t make sense,” he stated.
The pro-democracy campaigner, Bamidele Aturu surmised that although he was not expecting anything dramatic from the new IG but advised that he should study the errors of his predecessor and build on it.
“I am not expecting any significant changes under his leadership because he was part of the leadership of that regime and we have not been told anything that he did that is out of this world, so we just have to manage with him since the president is not thinking of the complete overhauling of the security system.”
He added: “We are just doing this fire-brigade approach of the president just changing the leadership just because people are saying, change the leadership. What we are saying is that, change leadership and also refocus and have creativity and let us bring some level of creativity to fighting crime,” he stated.

Boko Haram 17 suspected Sect Members Arrested In Enugu

Boko Haram 17 Suspected Sect Members Arrested In Enugu • As Heavily Armed Soldiers Take Over Kano Streets

POLICE detectives in Nsukka, Enugu State on Friday arrested 27 persons suspected to be members of the Boko Haram sect.

It was learnt that the security operatives intercepted the religious sect at Okpuje, a border town between Enugu and Kogi States, when they were being conveyed by a young driver and a conductor in a Toyota Bus belonging to the Zamfara State Government with registration number XA 581 MRD.
Saturday Tribune gathered that the incident occurred at a time guests were arriving for the on-going 41st convocation ceremony of the University of Nigeria, Nsukka, consequently causing apprehension in the university town and its environs.
Reports from Nsukka said that as the suspects were taken to the Nsukka Urban Police Station, many people in the area besieged the station to have a glimpse of them.
The suspects who are from the North were subsequently taken to the state police headquarters in Enugu under tight security. They were escorted by men of the police anti-terrorism squad and men of the police SARS in six police vans.
Informed source said that the Police had hectic time trying to stop the  crowd desperate to see the suspects and their ammunition which were neatly wrapped in synthetic/cellophane materials displayed by the police.
The bus had an inscription “Hattara Gayu” believed to be a symbol in Hausa language.
Apart from the guns and other items aforementioned, the police also recovered other unidentified items stored in bags and cellophane containers as well as some cables rolled up and tied with a rope.
“We were on our normal stop and search    when we suspected the vehicle, and we asked them where they were coming from. They said they were Zamfara indigenes coming to do business in Enugu State,” the State Police Public Relations Officer, Ebere Ama-rizu said.
Meanwhile, in order to ensure adequate protection of lives and property during and after Jumaat prayers, on Friday, in Kano city, military armoured tanks as well as security officers were stationed at strategic places in the state capital. This is just as military airforce helicopters as early 6 a.m, on Friday, were seen hovering around the city in an effort to ensure that there was no breakdown of law and order so as to avert a repeat of the incident of the previous Friday where well over a hundred people lost their lives to the Boko Haram bomb attacks that rocked the city.
Also, heavy security checks on vehicles entering and leaving the state capital were noticed, resulting in long queues of vehicles on major roads.